Flickr just told me: pay for upload more than 200 photos
August 21, 2009 | other, social mediaauthor: Karol Zielinski | comments: 1 | views: 519
Tags: account, earn money, flickr, images, limit, photos, upload
Few weeks ago I was looking for some website, that could aggregate my images. I was using Picasa Web Albums, but I don’t like it. I prefer to use it just for some kind of private photos, or something like that. I was looking for some kind of website, which could help me in creating collection of really well-designed websites or parts of websites. Flickr looks good, so that’s why I just started to using it.
After few weeks and upload some screenshots (174 images) – when I signed in to my flickr‘s account today I saw the message:
I didn’t know about it.
I don’t want to upgrade my account.
I don’t need more functionalities – I just want to upload more images.
Especially I don’t need more stats to my account, ad-free browsing and sharing or HD playback for high-definition video uploads.
Maybe the price ($24.95) is not so much… but I still don’t want to pay for it. I could pay for more functionalities (HD playback, more professional stats, upload files in other formats or some useful add-ons to my browser), I could pay for more space on my account (like in gmail), I could pay for ad-free browsing and sharing. However… I simply don’t want to pay for upload more than 200 images on my account. This limit is too low(!)
I know that flickr needs to earn money. It’s normal. However… is this kind of solutions are good practice? I think not. Especially when there are so many websites, where there are not so low limits.
What do you think about it?
August 21, 2009, 3:34 pm
Karol,
I think your remedy is clear. If you do not like Flickr’s policy, use the competition. As you point out, there are alternatives. The only way to affect bad policy is to walk away. If enough of their business leaves, they’ll adjust the policy until the bleed rate stabilizes to something they can live with.